CATHOLIC
SCHOOLS OF NEW JERSEY
CATHOLIC
SCHOOLS: THE VISION IN OUR TIME
The New Jersey Catholic Bishops
THE
MISSION
“The
Lord answered me and said: Write down the vision clearly upon the tablets,
presses to fulfillment, and will not disappoint…”
Habakkuk 2:2-3
Two hundred years
ago, on September 25, 1791, Congress adopted the first ten amendments to the
U.S. Constitution – the Bill of Rights.
Notable among the legal protections it affords individuals are those
guaranteed by the First Amendment: Congress shall make no law respecting an
establishment of religion or prohibiting its free exercise.
In light of this freedom, as early as the late eighteenth century, Baltimore’s Archbishop John Carroll pursued a goal that the faithful could be both American and Catholic. The broad mission of the Church was (and is) to evangelize, renewing humanity in the process and spiritually transforming individuals into God’s holy people. [1]
In those early days, the spread of the faith encountered cultural bias and required an innovative spirit. A missionary mentality prevailed, prompting clergy as well as laity to minister in ways creative and practical. The archbishop’s intuition saw education as an important means of evangelization. He envisioned a school which would pursue cultural goals and the natural development of youth. But it would be distinctive in the type of community climate it would generate – steeped, as it was, in the Gospel spirit of freedom and love. Prophetically, as the Second Vatican Council would later describe, the vision of the Catholic school would relate “all of human culture to the good news of salvation: so that the light of faith would illumine everything that the students would gradually come to learn about the world about life, and about the human person. [2]
As early as 1847,
New Jersey’s own Saint Peter’s School was founded and administered by
laity in New Brunswick. The stability of such parochial enterprises, however, came
through Saint Elizabeth Ann Seton, laywoman, convert, mother, and foundress of
the Sisters of Charity. Taking
her concept of a school, first attempted in Baltimore in 1808, she showed how
the sharing of that vision could be accomplished.
By 1859, the fifth branch of the Maryland community had been
established at Convent Station, and eight years later the Sisters of Charity
assumed the responsibilities of administering the parochial school already
functioning at Saint Peter’s, New Brunswick.
[3]
Just over a century
later, the United States Bishops would write that Catholic schools have always
had a special part in the mission of the Church.
“Of the education programs available,” they said in their pastoral
letter To Teach As Jesus Did, “Catholic schools afford the fullest
and best opportunity to realize the threefold purpose (message, community, and
service) of Catholic education among children and young people.”
[4]
The
History
“It
was (Bishop Bayley’s) dream that Catholic moral teaching and
values would make a difference,and Catholic school graduates would
be able, because of this foundation in value-centered education,
to make that difference in the American society in which they lived.”
[5]
N.J. Catholic School Summit (November, 1988)
In New Jersey,
Bishop James Roosevelt Bayley, the first Bishop of Newark, believed that
through the establishment of Catholic schools, young people, particularly
those of poor, immigrant families, could be educated as productive citizens.
Writing in the Metropolitan Catholic Almanac, he said, “There
are parochial schools connected with St. Patrick’s Cathedral, St. John’s
church, Newark, and with most of the churches in the diocese.”
[6]
Moreover, a document
exists dating back to the eighteenth century which indicates that a “primitive
schoolhouse was erected, and schools, supervised and supported by church
authorities, established in all of the larger settlements of East Jersey.”
[7]
Not surprisingly,
these schools, for well over a hundred years, helped to preserve the faith and
to create a Catholic subculture in our state, forming, as it were, a
triangular partnership of family, parish and school.
[8]
The Catholic
schools in New Jersey serve a significant number of families within all
socioeconomic areas. Through the generosity and foresight of the educational
leaders of earlier generations, our schools grew with the expansion of
communities and made a difference in the neighborhoods in which students
lived. The challenge of the
vision is no less important today for Catholics who live in these suburbs.
We invite today’s parents to enroll their children and to strengthen
the community of family, parish and school.
We urge all Catholics to support the vision.
The original
concern for families, including the immigrant and the less privileged, has
continued right up to the present time. We
cannot overemphasize the significance of parochial schools for the “new
immigrants” in our cities and suburbs.
Our schools are not elitist schools.
Despite a national average elementary tuition of nearly $1,000,
one-quarter of all students in Catholic schools today are minorities.
The Catholic school still represents for many, especially in urban
areas, an opportunity for quality education and character development.
[9]
These schools serve
the poor with great effectiveness. It
is hard to imagine how this achievement could be duplicated in any setting
other than the Catholic school.
[10]
The United States
Black Bishops Pastoral Letter, What We Have Seen and Heard, states that
“The Catholic school has been and remains one of the chief vehicles of
evangelization within the Black community.”
And the National Conference of Catholic Bishops, recognizing the long
record of excellence among Catholic educators generally, recommends a
particular response to the educational needs of today’s Hispanics.
“Education is an inalienable right,” the bishops write.
“…We therefore urge Catholic schools to offer additional
opportunities … and recommend adaptations which respond adequately to the
Hispanic presence in our schools.”
[11]
The new immigrants,
including Hispanics, Portuguese, Vietnamese, Cambodians, Koreans, Haitians and
other Caribbean peoples, offer a fresh challenge to schools which
traditionally empower those new to these shores to take advantage of the
opportunities and freedoms of the American enterprise system.
Today, the Black
bishops tell us, the Catholic school “represents – and this is no less
important – a sign of stability in an environment of chaos and flux.
It should be a source of legitimate pride that our schools are sought
after by many who are not Catholic, as well as Catholics, because of the
religious and moral values considered as part of quality education.”
[12]
The Vatican
congregation reminds us, “The special character of the Catholic school, and
the underlying reason for its existence, the reason why Catholic parents
should prefer it, is precisely the quality of the religious education
integrated into the overall education of the students.”
[13]
The vision,
therefore, remains and does not disappoint.
As important as
this history is, it is clear that Catholic schools are needed today more than
ever. As the current research
demonstrates, they are not only graduating academically qualified students,
but also young people with values and principles.
[14]
It is inconceivable
to think of the Church’s stance against today’s moral decay without the
presence of its schools. What
ministry in our country offers a moral vision and has a network wide enough to
influence people across the nation if it is not our Catholic schools?
[15]
Pope John Paul II
tells us, “in the community formed by the Catholic school, the power of the
Gospel has been brought to bear on thought patterns, standards of judgment and
norms of behavior.”
[16]
No, we dare not
shrink from our vision that the Catholic school is a working, effective family
ministry in the midst of the parish that deals with today’s secular
materialism and relativism.
Yet there are those who say the Catholic schools are in their twilight. They cite obvious problems: skyrocketing costs, changing demographics, and low salaries which impact the morale of remaining personnel. They object that many of those who often use the schools do not see the vital connection to the faith community on Sunday morning. It seems the real nemesis in the church’s evangelizing effort in Catholic school education is a loss of will. Bishop James W. Malone, former president of the U.S. Catholic Conference, indirectly expresses this concern in a recent article: “Somewhere, somehow in the last twenty-five years, an unconscious decision was made in the collective psyche of the Church in the United States, a decision that said Catholic schools are no longer an essential priority for Church life.” [17]
The Congregation
for Catholic Education assures us that “the Church is absolutely convinced
that the educational aims of the Catholic schools in the world today perform
an essential and unique service for the Church itself.
The absence of the Catholic school would be a great loss for
civilization and for the natural and supernatural destiny of (humanity).”
[18]
The
Reality
“Catholic
schools … are a response by the local Church to meet the
command by
in their unique responsibility
in the areas of faith and morals.”
[19]
Bishop John C. Reiss (Letter to Administrators, 1982)
The Family
(Parents)
The anniversary
which celebrates our basic rights as Americans provides the New Jersey Bishops
with an excellent opportunity to cite the tremendous accomplishments of the
state’s Catholic schools and to express gratitude to the families who
support Catholic school education. Clearly,
the vision presses to fulfillment. Many
parents sacrifice consumer goods, vacations and other pleasures enjoyed by
their neighbors in order to provide their children with what is a joyful,
healthy experience in Catholic schools.
[20]
They volunteer that
approximately 150,000 students in the state’s elementary and secondary
Catholic schools avail themselves of a special type of supportive learning,
grounded in the experience of Christian community, at the very time when
education and family life in general are in a period of unprecedented crisis.
[21]
Parents should take
special comfort in the realization that today’s Catholic school remains the
family’s true complement and firm support.
Undaunted by the powerful effects of television and society’s secular
messages, the local Catholic school uniquely celebrates the reality of Jesus
and provides a setting that emphasizes God’s truth, love and beauty in our
world. In the Catholic school,
values are shared and sacraments celebrated; through special liturgies,
children learn at a young age that the Eucharist plays an integral part in
their growth and development.
Our Catholic schools are effective witnesses to the presence of God among us. It is up to each of us to see that every one of our schools at least comes close to its description as a learning community of faith and love. That means our schools must be academically excellent and authentically Catholic. It also means we must do our best to see that they are open to the poor as well as the economically comfortable. [22]
“The
real benefit of Catholic schools is that they teach students the
full truth, relating life
can and do present the revelation God has
with the academics other schools provide. These truths are like pillars
on which the children’s lives are built.
The foundation for a
lifelong religious faith is laid.”
[23]
Bishop Frank J. Rodimer (The Beacon, August 21, 1986)
The
Interdependence of the School and the Future Church
The
legacy given those nurtured in the Catholic school has distinct consequences.
The data shows that Catholics who have attended Catholic school are
more apt to hold Christian attitudes and values as adults.
The research indicates that the effectiveness of Catholic schools is
not a function of the religiousness of the family, but rather the effect of
Catholic school attendance.
“Young
Catholic adults (under 30) who have attended Catholic schools,” the National
Opinion Research Center advises us, “are twice as likely to receive
Communion almost every week, to belong to parish organizations, and to
consider religious vocations than those who did not attend Catholic schools.”
[24]
Attending Catholic
high school has a strong effect on church attendance, charitable
contributions, and support for the institution of marriage.
[25]
Catholic schools
impact in this way, not so much through formal religious instruction, but
rather through the closeness to the Catholic community which the experience of
attending Catholic schools generates.
[26]
The
Educators (Teachers)
A
Genuine Ministry
Whenever
our Catholic schools are successful, it is because “teachers have made
integral human formation their very profession.”
[27]
They have recognized
their prime responsibility by creating a unique Christian school climate, not
one in competition with the public schools.
The
teacher’s ministry is at once genuine and exceptional.
Through Word and Sacrament, in individual behavior, in lessons taught
and lived, in friendly and harmonious interpersonal relationships, the
Catholic school teacher proclaims a special witness to Gospel values.
The
Contribution of Religious and Lay Teachers
A
teacher sends a message to a future time he or she will never see.
It is especially so with the Catholic school teacher, for he or she
does so at personal expense and with a high degree of self-giving for the
young. To the teacher, the Church reaffirms the value of such a
singular contribution.
An
immeasurable expression of gratitude is extended to the priests, religious
communities, and the laity of the past and present who have made the vision
real. In so many areas of the
state and nation, priests, religious sisters and brothers, and lay people have
contributed their very lives to maintain a quality education enriched by
faith.
The
Educated (Students)
An
Elaboration of the Empirical Evidence and Research Statements
The
students are the principal beneficiaries of the vision.
In an atmosphere enlivened by the Gospel spirit of charity, freedom and
responsibility, the Catholic school develops young personalities, a process
that enables them to mature in that new creation they became in baptism.
[28]
There
are other benefits as well. Research
consistently shows that Catholic schools are academically sound, more
demanding in terms of course work, and more effective than public schools for
comparable students.
[29]
For example,
sociologist James S. Coleman cites evidence of a 50 percent greater growth
among our Catholic school students than public school students in reading,
mathematics, writing and vocabulary. The
Rand Corporation, a private, nonprofit research organization, advises that
America’s cities would do well to pattern neighborhood high schools after
Roman Catholic schools and magnet public schools that have clear missions and
aggressively shape student values.
[30]
Indeed, graduates of
Catholic schools are more likely to attend college, and then continue in
college than comparable graduates from public schools.
Significantly, the advantages of Catholic school attendance are
greatest for minority and disadvantaged students.
Coleman’s
research on the Catholic school experience of a lowered dropout rate is
significant. Describing the
community aspects of the Catholic school community as a benefit he calls “social
capital,” he says that such social support arises from “the existence of a
functional community, a set of persons held together by the Church and by
common participation in religious activities – and by the explicit
connection of the school with that community.”
[31]
We identify Coleman’s
functional community as the Christian community, one in which the Lord’s
command to love one another is a practical reality.
The
Vision
“A
community has many obligations but none more pressing than its obligation to
provide for the education and development of its young people … The best way
to discharge this responsibility – as Council documents and Papal statements
have emphasized so often – is through the Catholic school.”
[32]
Bishop Edward T. Hughes, (Opening of School, 1987)
A
Call to the Community
“The need for the Catholic
school,” Pope John Paul II tells us, “becomes evidently clear when we
consider what it contributes to the development of the mission of the people
of God, to the dialogue between Church and the human community and to the
safeguarding of freedom and conscience.”
[33]
Clearly, then, the vision still
has its time.
All Catholics, especially alumni,
who have benefited from the existence of the Catholic school in the historical
evolution of the Church in America, need to discover its best kept secret and
appreciate anew what an exceptional ministry it is, one that adds to the basic
freedoms of its students and is vital in shaping the faith of the 21st
century.
Consequently, all the faithful are
responsible for Catholic school education, not just parents who presently have
children of school age.
“The obligation to sustain the
Church’s institutions,” the United States Bishops tell us, “falls on all
the members of the community because of their baptism; the obligation is not
just on users or those who staff them.”
[34]
Likewise, every parish, whether or
not it has a school, has the responsibility to provide for the Catholic school
education of all young people.
These convictions require an
ongoing review of priorities and energies in our state.
Succinctly, they call for a recommitment to a cause which has proven
itself to the people of the melting pot era and offers new hope for the
future. For these “Catholic
schools have a distinct character which transcends religious programs and
personnel.”
[35]
The Enthusiasm in Serving
We pastors urge our brothers and
sisters to renew their appreciation and support for a ministry which has so
enthusiastically served our young people in the past.
An Understandable Cost (Similar to What our Immigrant Parents Bore) –
The “New Immigrants”
Necessarily, the cost of the
vision remains substantial, but has precedent.
Our immigrant ancestors took from their nickels and dimes and
established, at great personal sacrifice, the best private school system the
world has ever known. Moreover, they did so, to a great extent, because the faith
was threatened by hostile, outside forces and influences.
But, whereas the objects of our
ancestors’ fears were clearly known, the superficiality of today’s society
makes it, in many ways, an even more formidable foe.
For the secular power of the 1990s is a vague but pervasive force.
It freely invades our homes and subtly affects our choices.
In a world dominated by the material, the spiritual being within is
largely ignored. Even though many
Catholics who send their children to public school take seriously their
obligation to educate their children in the faith, in fact, more than
one-third of all Catholic young people receive no formal religious education
at all.
[36]
We face the poverty of the needy and the emptiness of the affluent. We worry about whether tomorrow’s Catholics will have strong faith. The Catholic school prepares our youth to meet these challenges by enlightening their minds and inspiring their hearts.
Will Parents be Challenged Anew?
The question remains whether our
parents will accept the invitation to enroll their children in Catholic
schools. Will they see it as a
way to fulfill their responsibilities as parents?
Will they be willing to do everything possible to support these
schools? The financial efforts
will be great, but the benefits will be greater still.
[37]
Decisions made today
to preserve the moral integrity of the young will reap future benefits beyond
our imagination.
A
Call to the Leaders
“Without the Vision, the People
Perish”
“Our Church and our nation have
been enriched because of the quality of education provided in Catholic schools
over the last 300 years … Now we are called to sustain and expand this
vitally important ministry of the Church,” the U.S. Bishops told us in a
statement of support in November 1990.
[38]
We, as Catholic Church leaders, in
the State of New Jersey, reaffirm our conviction that the Catholic school has
a primary place in the mission of the Church.
The Importance of Pastoral Leadership: Pastors & Principals Together
If it be true that unconsciously
Catholic schools are no longer perceived as the foundation they once were,
priests, in particular, will need to reevaluate their commitment.
Without a vision shared again from the pulpit, parental responsibility
will never be realized or recruitment efforts sustained.
“In my opinion,” Sister Mary
Peter Traviss, O.P., said at the N.J. Catholic School Summit, “Catholic
schools are no longer a priority with the faithful because we in the school
community have not shared our own good news; we have not educated our Church
about what some say is its most effective apostolate in terms of the future
health of the Church …”
[39]
A Visionary Clergy: Back on Track
First and foremost, then, we
encourage our pastors, in their vital leadership role, to appreciate the
concept of the regionalized school. Every
parish – whether it has its own school or not – shares the responsibility
to preserve and develop Catholic school education within the diocese.
[40]
While Catholic schools have been
identified historically with a particular parish, these co-sponsored schools
will necessarily lead to broader cooperation among parishes.
Local policies must be developed to insure mutual participation in a
school’s governance and a basic fairness in sharing the cost of its support. It will be necessary that tuition rates and charges be
balanced and regulated in light of the whole community’s responsibility to
educate effectively the next generation in the faith.
Planning, long-range and
short-range, is essential. Such
planning may well lead to fewer schools in a given geographical area or even
to the erection of new buildings where required.
Catholics in general must be more realistic about church contributions;
the financial difficulties of the schools would be greatly alleviated if
Catholics gave more than 1.1 percent of their income, just half of what they
once gave.
[41]
Justice and the Catholic School Teacher
Without doubt, Catholic schools
are an expensive operation. They
receive practically no help from public sources.
The gift of the Church to the community at large now amounts to over $1
billion per year in New Jersey. Even
with such a huge outlay, the reality of Catholic school education in the state
would not be possible without significant contributed services from lay
teachers who work for wages far less than those paid in public schools.
Unfortunately, it is impossible to
compete with the state in the matter of salaries.
Moreover, the increase in operational costs which better salaries would
demand must not add to the expense in such a way that the poor are excluded. We cannot be genuinely Catholic if we ever do that.
[42]
But justice also demands that
teacher salaries be review and adjusted.
It is a most pressing need. As
bishops, we recognize that we must provide our teachers, both religious and
lay, with a remuneration which is proper and in keeping with their important
service.
[43]
We commit ourselves
to the principle that those who serve the Church should receive a sufficient
livelihood and enjoy the social benefits common in our nation.
[44]
We encourage the
whole Catholic community to support our Catholic school teachers in an
equitable manner.
“It
is essential that the entire Church … recognize the value and importance of
Catholic schools. The obstacles
(they face) will not be overcome easily.
To
surmount them will require additional sacrifice and commitment on everyone’s
part. Careful planning will be
critical. Difficult decisions
will need to
be made. Restructuring rarely
takes place without some dislocation and pain. … Above all, we must work
together if we are to preserve the precious legacy of a Catholic school
education available to all families.”
[45]
Bishop James T. McHugh,
(Response to the Catholic School Planning and Development Committee, 1990)
New
Solutions to Common Problems
Alternate Funding – A Call to the Extended Community
Of course, the solution to our
funding problems cannot remain solely within the domain of tuition and parish
subsidy. Creatively, new alternate funding methods must be sought and
explored. Beyond the wider
Catholic community, appeals for assistance need to be made to the corporate
communities and to those who hold political office in our municipalities,
state and nation.
Marketing and Public Relations
This will necessarily involve a
more effective marketing of our schools, a public relations effort which can
accomplish a number of things. First,
we must show how Catholic schools complement and help parents.
Next, we must underscore the great success our schools have had in
reacting to the needs of the disadvantaged and the country’s “new
immigrants.” And finally, we
should demonstrate how our religious curriculum confronts many of the ills
which our society experiences, while offering genuine community.
[46]
Staff Development
Presently, as the research shows,
the Catholic religious identity of our schools and their academic competence
remain high. But we stand on the
shoulders of the giants who have preceded us.
If our schools are to continue to be the vehicles of evangelization
that they are, lay leadership identification and training must become
priorities in our planning. For
the future to be assured, the vision must be shared.
Only through effective staff development can we guarantee the quality
of our schools.
Higher Education’s Responsibility
Now is the time for the Catholic
institutions of higher learning in the United States to return to the parishes
in some small measure what they have derived from the religious orthodoxy of
the elementary and secondary Catholic schools.
[47]
In this regard, these
institutions can provide invaluable assistance in educating future Catholic
school teachers of our state at minimal or greatly reduced costs.
The State’s Responsibility
With any analysis at all, it is
clear Catholic schools have been the victims of widespread bias.
While paying lip service to the merits of Catholic school education,
many public officials refuse to give the schools their fair share of public
funding. Consider the exclusion
of church-related schools from voucher plans which would provide a real choice
of schools to parents. All too
often the Church is called upon to assist in social programs, ecumenical
dialogues and even political endeavors, yet requests for reciprocal assistance
in securing aid for Catholic school parents and students are consistently
rejected.
[48]
Real Choice: Vouchers
Now is the time to galvanize our
Catholic laity. One of the great
injustices in our society, unique among the Western democracies, is the lack
of tax support for parents who educate their children in religious schools. Under an all-inclusive voucher system, one based squarely on
the constitutional right all parents have to choose the school their children
will attend, Catholic elementary and secondary schools would receive the type
of support that until now has been reserved for public and religious schools
of higher education. In this
regard, the Constitutional question of the separation of Church and state has
never been compelling.
Additionally, public education
itself could improve through a new standard of competition.
John E. Chubb of the Brookings Institution and Stanford University
political science professor Terry M. Moe feel that the only way to make real
headway in America’s educational problems is to create an entirely new
system of public education – one based solely on parental choice.
“Our guiding principle in the design of a choice system is this:
Public authority must be put to use in creating a system that is almost
entirely beyond the reach of public authority.”
[49]
President Bush’s
educational choice initiative provides a breath of hope for the parents and
children of Catholic schools. Catholics
should endorse the President’s plan by appealing to their legislators for
support.
Conclusion
We, the Bishops of New Jersey,
believe that the Catholics of today are as strong as their parents and
grandparents. We feel that
finances and needed resources are as available to us at they were to our
ancestors. But the reality of the
best kept secret needs to stir the hearts of the extended faithful.
We accept, then, the challenge the
Holy Father gives us to develop new approaches to preserve our Catholic
schools. In this year of the Bill
of Rights, we agree that “There are many paths to democracy and public
education. The path America has
been treading for the past half-century is exacting a heavy price – one the
nation and its children can ill afford to bear, and need not.”
[50]
[1] The Religious Dimension of Education in a Catholic School, Congregation for Catholic Education, April, 1988, 66.
[2] Declaration on Christian Education, Gravissimum educationis, 8.
[3] The History of St. Peter’s Elementary School, Diocese of Metuchen Files.
[4] To Teach As Jesus Did, 1972, #101.
[5] Archbishop McCarrick, Pastoral Letter on Catholic School Education, August, 1987.
[6] Ibid.
[7] Ibid.
[8] William McGready, Catholic Schools and Catholic Youth, Commitment and Community.
[9] The Black Bishops Pastoral, What We Have Seen and Heard, 1984.
[10] Bishop Rodimer, Address to Pastors and Elementary School Principals, October, 1987.
[11] The National Conference of Catholic Bishops, The Hispanic Presence: Challenge and Commitment, 12 f.
[12] The Black Bishops Pastoral, op. cit.
[13] The Religious Dimension of Education in a Catholic School, op. cit.
[14] Sister Mary Peter Traviss, O.P., N.J. Catholic School Summit, November, 1988.
[15] Archbishop Bevilacqua, Catholic Schools in the 21st Century.
[16] John Paul II in New Orleans in 1987.
[17] Bishop James Malone, “The Religious Dimension of Catholic Education,” Chicago Studies, November, 1989, p.275.
[18] “The Religious Dimension of Education in a Catholic School,” op. cit.
[19] Bishop Reiss, Introductory Letter to the 1982 Handbook of Policies and Practices for Elementary Schools and Secondary Schools.
[20] Bishop McHugh, Address to Parent-Teachers Association, May, 1990.
[21] Pennsylvania’s Catholic Schools: A Tradition of Excellence.
[22] Archbishop McCarrick, “Education – A High Priority,” The Advocate, October 26, 1986.
[23] Bishop Rodimer, “Are Catholic Schools Worth the Price We Pay?,” The Beacon, August 21, 1986.
[24] William McGready, op. cit.
[25] N.C.E.A., The Heart of the Matter: Effects of Catholic High Schools on Student Values, Beliefs and Behaviors.
[26] Andrew Greeley, “My Research on Catholic Schools,” Chicago Studies, November, 1989, p.251.
[27] Lay Catholics in Schools: Witness to the Faith, October 15, 1982, 15.
[28] Archbishiop McCarrick, Pastoral Letter on Catholic School Education, August, 1987.
[29] James S. Coleman, Public and Private High Schools: The Impact of Community.
[30] Rand Corp., High Schools with Character: Alternatives to Bureaucracy, October, 1990.
[31] James S. Coleman, “Schools and Communities,” Chicago Studies, November, 1989, p.234.
[32] Bishop Hughes, Opening of School, 1987.
[33] Pope John Paul II
[34] National Conference of Catholic Bishops, Economic Justice for All, Washington, DC, USCC, 1986, No. 347.
[35] Bryk and Holland, Effective Catholic School: an Exploration.
[36] William McGready, “Catholic Schools and Catholic Identity: ‘Stretching the Vital Connection,” Chicago Studies, November, 1989, p. 230.
[37] Bishop Hughes, op. cit.
[38] U.S. Bishops’ Meeting, Support for Catholic Schools, November, 1990.
[39] Sister Mary Peter Traviss, O.P., N.J. Catholic School Summit, November, 1988.
[40] Archbishop McCarrick, Pastoral Letter on Catholic School Education, August, 1987.
[41] Andrew Greeley and Bishop William McManus, Catholic Contributions: Sociology and Policy.
[42] Archbishop McCarrick, “Education – A High Priority,” The Advocate, October 26, 1986.
[43] Archbishop McCarrick, Pastoral Letter on Catholic School Education, August, 1987.
[44] National Conference of Catholic Bishops, Economic Justice for All, Washington, D.C., USCC, 1986, No. 347.
[45] Bishop McHugh, Response to the Catholic School Planning and Development Committee., November, 1990.
[46] Joseph Cardinal Bernardin, “Catholic Schools: Opportunities and Challenges,” Chicago Studies, November, 1989, p.213.
[47] Archbishop Bevilacqua, op. cit.
[48] Bishop McHugh, Address to Parent-Teachers Association.
[49] John E. Chubb & Terry M. Moe, Politics, Markets & America’s Schools, Washington, D.C., The Brookings Institution, 1990, p.218.
[50] Ibid.