New Jersey Catholic Conference

211 North Warren Street · Trenton, New Jersey 08618-4894

(609) 599-2110 · Fax (609) 392-3094

E-mail:  info@njcathconf.com

Web:  www.njcathconf.com

 

 

                                                                                                                                                                                                William F. Bolan, Jr., J.D.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                Executive Director

                                                                                                                                                                               

                                                                                                                                                                June 7, 2004

 

 

To:                  Senator Joseph Vitale, Chairman

Members of the Senate Health, Human Services and Senior Citizens Committee

 

From:               Marlene Lao-Collins, Associate Director of Social Concerns

 

           

 

Oppose S620 and S1093 which would open adoption records

 

 

The New Jersey Catholic Conference the public policy agency for the Catholic Bishops of New Jersey urges you to oppose the passage of S620 sponsored by Senator Diane Allen and S1093 Sponsored by Senators Joseph Vitale and Barbara Buono which opens adoption records retroactively and prospectively.  The bills permit an adopted person 18 years of age or older; a direct descendent 18 years of age or older of the adopted person if the adopted person is deceased or the adoptive parents or guardian of a minor adopted person access to birth records that has been sealed in some case for decades. 

 

The New Jersey Catholic Conference has a particular concern for the thousands of birth parents who surrendered their babies to Catholic Charity agencies with confidentiality as their legal protection and guarantee.  The need for confidentiality prevents them from testifying before this committee and we are compelled to speak on their behalf.  Many have gone through life depending upon this confidentiality and have chosen not to share this part of their past with their spouse and children.  This legislation shatters this guarantee and would be devastating to them. 

 

The guarantee of confidentiality for each party and their right to privacy are principles that should be preserved in the law.  Open access to records can often cause deep psychological stress and profound life disruptions.  Under present law licensed adoption agencies can assist adopted persons in being reunited with a birth parent, but consent is required by both parties and professional counseling is often made available to those adopted persons who desire reunion. 

 

We are eager to encourage reunions between birth parents and adult adoptee but only when both sides consent to the reunion.  We support the enactment of a mutual consent registry whereby adoptees and birth parents can make it known that they wish to contact each other.  The registry could then act as a broker for that contact.  In this way the right of all parties can be protected.  The registry could also make available non-identifying information about medical and social characteristics of birth family members and family health histories. 

 

Today’s adoption environment is very different then 50 years ago.  Open adoptions are encouraged and many mutually accept this method of adoption allowing for some type of contact between birth parent and adoptive parents.   Adoptive parents and adoptees receive medical history of the birth parents.  But these bills would retroactively strip the rights of birth parents to privacy without any prior notice.  This lack of effective notice for those who were guaranteed this right under the laws that existed at the time of adoption is fundamentally unfair.

 

We urge this legislature not to renege on the guarantee of the law accorded to birth parents for over fifty years. Whether or not you agree with the legislative policy decisions, the NJ Legislature guaranteed birth parents confidentiality (N.J.S.A. 26:8-40.1 and N.J.S.A. 9:3-52).  We believe that maintaining confidentiality as provided by law in the past and in the future is essential.  Without such measure we are concerned that many will seek desperate measures such as abortion or even abandonment.

 

We urge you instead to establish a mutual consent registry which can be used by consenting adults who no longer have concerns about revealing their identity without eradicating the existing law.  This registry could also address the legitimate concerns of an adoptee obtaining medical history information by providing access to non-identifying developmental and medical history information as well as social characteristics of birth family members.

 

The New Jersey Catholic Conference urges you not to releases S620 and S1093 without considering the benefits of a mutual consent registry.

 

 

Representing the Archdiocese of Newark, Diocese of Camden, Diocese of Metuchen,

Diocese of Paterson, Diocese of Trenton, Byzantine Catholic Eparchy of Passaic and

Our Lady of Deliverance Syriac Catholic Diocese