FACT SHEET ON NONPUBLIC SCHOOL TRANSPORTATION

 

GOAL: TO REMOVE THE “NOTWITHSTANDING LANGUAGE” AFFECTING NONPUBLIC SCHOOL TRANSPORTATION FROM THE FY’07 STATE BUDGET

 

The following points should be helpful to you in discussing the nonpublic school transportation issue with legislators, particularly with those on the Senate Budget and Appropriations Committee and the Assembly Budget Committee:

 

*      Nonpublic school transportation is the ‘life blood” of parents’ ability to

      send their children to a nonpublic school.

 

*      Transporting nonpublic school children to school has been New Jersey law since

      1968, but the Legislature never intended that 41.7% of the students (the 2005-

      2006 school year figure) would be given aid-in-lieu payments instead of

      transportation.

 

*      Nonpublic school transportation will always cost more than public school

      transportation because it involves fewer students traveling more miles. 

 

*      We are still feeling the effects of the extensive freeze on the ceiling for nonpublic

      school transportation during the last decade. Since FY’91, the ceiling for

      nonpublic school transportation has not kept pace with inflation.

 

*      Nonpublic school parents are helpless because the vast majority of nonpublic

            school students are transported by private bus contractors because districts

            have no more available busses. The Legislature has been unable to cap costs on

            these routes, and thus more and more nonpublic school routes get cancelled

            as a result of bids exceeding the ceiling for nonpublic school transportation.

         

*      When a nonpublic school route is cancelled, a significant number of the students

            on that route are forced to transfer to a public school, against the better judgment

            of their parents. Parents are simply unable to transport their children to school, no

            matter what the aid-of-lieu payments may be. The taxpayers of New Jersey then

            become responsible for educating the children in public schools.

 

*      NO ELIGIBLE PUBLIC SCHOOL CHILD WILL BE DENIED A RIDE TO

            SCHOOL DURING THE 2006-2007 SCHOOL YEAR BECAUSE OF AN

            IMPOSED CEILING ON THE COST OF THE RIDE. THEREFORE, THE

            INCREASE IN THE PRICE OF GASOLINE WILL HAVE NO EFFECT ON

            THESE STUDENTS.

 

*      A 4.04% increase (commensurate with the change in the Consumer Price

            Index (or CPI) is needed this year because of the increase in fuel costs which

            will double or triple that amount.

 

 

*      No amount of money is needed to be added to the Budget initially to cover this

            increase. There is already $307,287,000 in state aid available. There may or may

            not be an additional $2.8-3M needed later in the budget year, depending on the

            total state aid numbers and how many routes are actually bid to the maximum of

the new ceiling.  The maximum amount would only be necessary in instances where

all of the eligible nonpublic school students (95,036 according to last year’s figure)

had their routes bid to the maximum amount. 

 

*      This small increase will continue to provide safe rides to school for many

            nonpublic school students, and it is indeed a modest amount in the context

            of a $30.9B State Budget.

 

*      Nonpublic school officials and parents have made, and will continue to make,

            every effort to accommodate the needs of district transportation coordinators,

            officials of coordinated transportation services agencies, and school bus

            contractors by changing the opening and closing times of schools to

            permit the “looping” of busses.

 

*      Nonpublic school officials and parents have also devised creative ways to make

            bus routes operate within the statutory ceiling by using centralized stops with

            more children available at each stop, in order to reduce the amount of time

            needed to operate a route. HOWEVER, THESE CREATIVE SOLUTIONS

            CAN ONLY HELP FOR SO LONG WITHOUT ADDITIONAL FUNDING.

 

*      Nonpublic school students also ride on busses with public school students in

            order to create greater efficiency.

 

*      Under the provisions of NJSA 18A: 39.3, districts may renew contracts for

            routes for the transportation of students as long as the increase in the

            original contract price does not exceed the rise in the Consumer Price

            Index. However, the notwithstanding language in the FY’07 Budget

            prohibits the rise in the CPI from being applied to the ceiling for

            nonpublic school transportation (another case in which discrimination

            occurs for nonpublic school students). Thus, the intended effects of the

            provisions of NJSA 18A: 39.3 are negated by the current budget language,

            and public school students will not be denied a ride to school, while nonpublic

            school children will.

 

*      The “notwithstanding language” reverses the provisions of NJSA 18A: 39-1A,

            signed into law on January 10, 2002, to provide the CPI increase to nonpublic

            transportation. The bill received wide bipartisan support during it passage.